Performance Philosophy is an international network open to all researchers concerned with the relationship between performance & philosophy.

  • Anyone can be a member of Performance Philosophy and it is free to join. Just click on the link that says 'Sign Up' in the box above. 
  • All members are free to propose new groups within Performance Philosophy. These can be either geographic or thematic groups. Please see the 'About' page for more information. Or go to 'Groups' to propose a new group.
  • If you have any problems using this website, please contact: 
  • For general enquiries about Performance Philosophy, please contact Laura Cull: l.cull@surrey.ac.uk

Forum

What does the structureless of shock look like?

Started by Jim Daly. Last reply by Bernard Roddy Feb 22. 1 Reply

You can't impose structure on shock, can you? Continue

Bishop and Bourriaud

Started by Bernard Roddy. Last reply by Monica Gontovnik Aug 19, 2016. 1 Reply

Claire Bishop's book, Artificial Hells, provides a useful resource to engage with a set of works in performance of relevance to studio practice today. I am uploading my notes on the the first pages…Continue

Claire Bishop and Nicholas Bourriaud

Started by Bernard Roddy Jul 26, 2016. 0 Replies

Claire Bishop's book, Artificial Hells, provides a useful resource to engage with a set of works in performance of relevance to studio practice today. I am uploading my notes on the the first pages…Continue

Tags: aesthetics, relational, criticism, art, performance

Nowhere Near London (or, The Late Walter Benjamin)

Started by Fred Dalmasso Jun 23, 2016. 0 Replies

is to be given its premiere in the main auditorium at theWatford Palace Theatre on Monday, July 4th, 7.30pmsee …Continue

Blog Posts

THE OBJECT TURNED INSIDE OUT

Posted by Allen Alain Viguier on June 16, 2017 at 17:36 0 Comments

Object art is entirely processual and performative. No object preexists a perspective, a context and a participant-observer. The object post-object was not has been turned on its head, and turned inside out. A site dedicated to second order observation.…

Continue

Notes on Performance art, the Body and the Political.pdf

Posted by Andrea Pagnes (VestAndPage) on March 12, 2017 at 15:54 0 Comments

For anyone interested, I have linked on my page profile at the voice 'texts' my curatorial and post event catalogue text of the 2nd Live art exhibition project Venice International Performance Art Week: Ritual Body-Political Body (Venice, 2014).

DAAD Faculty Summer Seminar on Performance Theory/Performance Practice

Posted by David J Levin on February 20, 2017 at 21:17 0 Comments

Hi All, a quick note to remind everyone that applications for the DAAD Faculty Summer Seminar on Performance Theory & Performance Practice to be held on the campus of the University of Chicago are due March 1. The seminar, organized in cooperation with the Chicago Performance Lab, will take place from June 19, 2017-July 15, 2017. Information on stipends & applications can be found …

Continue

Experimental Residency Programs for Artists & Academics (Spring/Summer 2017)

Posted by Aaron Finbloom on February 7, 2017 at 16:46 0 Comments

The School of Making Thinking hosts a summer residency program for qualified artists and thinkers to work alongside each other for one to three week sessions. We continually experiment with structure, approaches to programming, and alternative pedagogies. Our residents have included sound and performance artists, poets, philosophers, painters, botanists, dancers, playwrights, filmmakers, video artists, documentarians, and historians, among other diverse practices.
Applications…
Continue

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Reflections after Performance Philosophy at Trinity Laban - March 2013

Jonathan Clark kindly invited me to give a talk on PP at Trinity Laban yesterday evening - a really welcome opportunity, for me at least, to think through my sense of where Performance Philosophy is at thus far and where it might go in future. In particular though it was great to meet so many researchers from across the disciplines, though particularly Music and Dance, who are concerned with a lot of the same issues that have been bugging me for years. We talked a lot, for instance, about some of the remaining issues around PaR - the continuing resistance to the notion that practice can speak for itself in terms of its research status, and indeed, the question of whether the predominant notion of "research" in UK HEIs (ie. the AHRC definition) is the most appropriate one for our practices. Jonathan raised some really interesting points around the conventional expectations often imposed on practitioners working in PaR contexts. For instance, the apparently unassailable requirement for practitioners to "have a process", to be able to "articulate" and "critically interrogate" that process. A number of Music PhD students and I also talked afterwards about the extent to which the insistence on a textual dimension to the majority of PaR PhDs might be understood as a reflection of persistent anxieties around the judgment or evaluation of practice (or the supposedly subjective nature thereof). Of course, this has all been discussed before, but it did press me to think further about what Performance Philosophy might bring to the table of such conversations, to what extent PP might provide a site for developing alternative models of thinking practice alongside the PaR paradigm.

Nik Wakefield also asked some important questions about the architecture of PP - something, I must confess I have not thought a greal deal about until now. He was thinking of the sites Performance Philosophy might require or create for its practices - whether in terms of thinking through what a Performance Philosophy classroom might look like, or in terms of the flexibility of spaces required by an inter-discipline that potentially combines diverse performance practices including new performative forms of philosophy. The matter of site, as we went on to discuss, is also a socio-political consideration in terms of my own sense that Performance Philosophy must remain open to those who challenge our existing ideas of what constitutes [proper] 'philosophy' or 'performance'. Rather than feeling we need to pin down definitions of what constitutes 'philosophy' or 'performance' - and hence Performance Philosophy - I feel more excited by the prospect of a field in which both terms can be reconceived on the basis of their encounter. Fixed definitions (based, for instance, on notions of what is 'recognized' as philosophy) seem to risk excluding not only the new, but also the outsider or unauthorized forms of thinking that go on outwith the academy. Likewise with performance.

So there are questions about how PP might relate to a public beyond academia and the art world. But  there were also questions around the forms of event Performance Philosophy might produce in future (beyond the University situated conference). It made me think back to a project I worked on with my colleagues in the SpRoUt collective called 'Under Construction'. One idea here was to create a platform that would allow us to stage an event in perpetual process - http://underconstruction.wikidot.com/about-sprout/

Likewise, perhaps a future PP event could involve providing the tools, spaces, frameworks for researchers to produce their own forms of event rather than pre-empting the nature of those with the panel/workshop structure and the limits of the University architecture. Places like Conway Hall in London are also interesting for their in-between status, and have hosted interesting film philosophy events in the past that might also provide another potential model http://conwayhall.org.uk/looking-in-looking-out-2

Anyway, in case its of interest, my Powerpoint from the talk is available here. Looking forward to talking more at the conference - not long now!

Powerpoint from Trinity Laban talk 

Views: 132

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Performance Philosophy to add comments!

Join Performance Philosophy

Comment by Jonathan Owen Clark on April 2, 2013 at 17:41

Thanks again for the talk Laura. I think the issues raised above deserve more discussion, especially what you call the 'unassailable' PaR requirements in our HEI's. I've just joined this forum, and hope to contribute on this, and other matters, in future.

© 2017   Created by Laura Cull.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service